Ask most people who “works harder” in a household and you’ll get a shrug. But ask an economist to measure that work, and something strange happens: half of it disappears. A farmer ploughing a field is “working.” His wife weeding the same field, fetching water, cooking the meals that keep the household running, and caring for children and elders is often just “helping out.” This gap between what gets counted and what gets ignored is the story of gender roles, and it shapes everything from household budgets to national GDP figures.
Table of Contents
What exactly are gender roles?
Gender roles are the responsibilities and behaviours a society assigns to people based on whether they are perceived as male or female, not based on what they are actually good at. A woman who is a skilled mechanic and a man who is a talented cook are still often expected to fit into roles that have nothing to do with their abilities.
Social scientists use the term division of labour to describe how tasks get split between men and women. This division is not natural or biological. It is built by culture, and it looks different depending on whether a society is patriarchal, matrilineal, or organised some other way. In most parts of the world, including India, patriarchal norms have historically placed men in charge of income-earning work and decision-making, while women are expected to manage the home.
The productive-reproductive divide
Economists sort human activity using a framework called the System of National Accounts (SNA), which decides what counts toward a country’s GDP. Work that involves buying, selling, or wages, like farming for the market, manufacturing, or salaried jobs, gets counted. Work that involves no cash exchange, like raising children, cooking, or nursing a sick parent, generally does not. According to the production boundary concept used by economists, this is the invisible line separating paid work that shows up in GDP from unpaid work that doesn’t.
This boundary was never gender-neutral. Men have historically been concentrated in SNA-recognised, income-generating activities, while women have carried most of the reproductive load: bearing and rearing children, running the household, and caring for the elderly and sick. Research on unpaid domestic work in India shows that women engaged in these tasks are grouped with unpaid household workers and are denied recognition as workers, which keeps them excluded from labour statistics and development policy altogether.
The numbers make the imbalance stark. As per a nationwide time-use survey by India’s Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, close to 80 percent of women engage in unpaid domestic services and spend around five hours a day on them, compared to about 20 percent of men spending roughly ninety minutes a day on the same kind of work. Globally, the pattern repeats: women perform more than three-quarters of all unpaid care work hours, over three times as much as men, according to the International Labour Organization. This is not a difference in effort. It is a difference in whose effort gets written down.
Caroline Moser’s triple burden framework
In the 1980s, planning expert Caroline Moser offered a framework that made this invisible workload visible. She argued that women, especially in lower-income countries, are simultaneously juggling three distinct kinds of roles, something later development scholars have called the triple burden or triple role.
Reproductive role
This covers childbearing, child-rearing, elder care, and all the day-to-day household work needed to keep a family functioning. It is essential, constant, and almost entirely unpaid.
Productive role
This includes economic activity that brings in income or goods, but for women it usually means part-time, informal, or agricultural work rather than stable, recognised employment. Moser’s framework points out that women’s productive work is frequently squeezed into whatever hours are left after reproductive duties are handled.
Community managing role
This is the voluntary work of keeping a community running: organising healthcare access, maintaining shared resources, or supporting local schools. According to the European Institute for Gender Equality, Moser’s approach maps the gender division of labour by simply asking who does what within the household and community.
Men, by contrast, tend to concentrate their energy on two roles rather than three: productive work and community politics. Crucially, when men do community work, it is often paid or carries status, such as leadership positions, while women’s community contributions, like managing water access or health outreach, remain unpaid and unrecognised. Moser’s real contribution was showing that any policy or development programme that looks only at income-generating work will completely miss the two-thirds of a woman’s day spent on reproductive and community labour.
Gender roles shift across cultures and time
If gender roles were rooted in biology, they would look the same everywhere. They don’t. Historical surveys of agricultural societies found enormous variation in how farming tasks were split by gender across different cultural groups, with some communities sharing fieldwork almost equally and others assigning it almost entirely to one sex. What counts as “women’s work” in one region can be considered “men’s work” a few hundred kilometres away.
In parts of India, for instance, unskilled agricultural labour, like weeding, harvesting, and post-harvest processing, is often treated as low-status work handed to women, even though it demands stamina and skill. Comparative research on Himalayan farming communities found that women in some mountain regions of India perform between 4.6 and 5.7 times the agricultural labour that men do. In several African farming contexts, by contrast, similar physically demanding fieldwork has historically been classified as men’s responsibility. Meanwhile, in much of Europe and the United States, social attitudes have been shifting, with men’s participation in cooking, cleaning, and childcare becoming more visible and more expected than it was a generation ago.
None of this proves men and women are naturally suited to different tasks. It proves the opposite: that gender roles are cultural scripts, not fixed rules, and scripts can be rewritten.
Why undervaluing women’s work has real consequences
When productive work outside the SNA framework, like tending a kitchen garden, managing livestock, or working in the informal sector, is not classified as “real work,” several things happen. First, women lose bargaining power within the household because their contribution isn’t seen as equivalent to a wage. Second, even when women do earn money, whether through daily wage labour, small businesses, or formal jobs, their income is frequently treated as supplementary rather than essential, regardless of how much of the household budget it actually covers.
Third, and perhaps most importantly, this invisibility feeds into national policy. A detailed analysis of India’s Time Use Survey data found that Indian women spend several times more hours on unpaid care work than men, and that this pattern holds regardless of a woman’s education level, income, or marital status, meaning better-educated or higher-earning women are not automatically relieved of the unpaid workload. If planners don’t measure this burden, they cannot design maternity benefits, childcare infrastructure, eldercare support, or labour policy that actually reflects how much time women have left over for paid work.
Recognising the productive and community value of what women already do isn’t just a matter of fairness. It is a precondition for designing gender policy that works. A skills training programme scheduled at a time that clashes with childcare duties will fail. A microfinance scheme that ignores how much of a woman’s day is already spoken for will underperform. Seeing the full picture of who does what, and why, is the first step toward closing these gaps.
What do you think? If unpaid domestic and care work were added to India’s GDP calculations, how do you think that would change public conversations around gender equality? And where in your own household or community have you noticed the productive-reproductive divide play out?
References
- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unpaid_work
- https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-020-0488-2
- https://www.pib.gov.in/PressReleasePage.aspx?PRID=1782637®=48&lang=2
- https://www.ilo.org/resource/news/ilo-calls-urgent-action-prevent-looming-global-care-crisis-0
- https://eige.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/mh0319273enn_002.pdf
- https://ingenaes.illinois.edu/wp-content/uploads/ING-Info-Sheet-2016_09-3-Moser-Triple-Role-Framework-Ludgate.pdf
- https://www.grida.no/resources/8305
- https://www.orfonline.org/research/building-india-s-economy-on-the-backs-of-women-s-unpaid-work-a-gendered-analysis-of-time-use-data
Leave a Reply